Skip to content

Sensors

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

30 results found

  1. As an IT Administrator who is moving off VMWare I would like to monitor Proxmox so that I have the metrics from the software which I am using today with my current virtualization sensors.

    17 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Push the maximum sensor count possible on a single PRTG installation.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,


    Great news! Your idea has been reviewed and is now officially on our roadmap! This means we've committed to developing it in the future.


    While we don't have an exact release date yet, we're planning to implement this feature/improvement as part of our upcoming development cycles. We're excited about the value this will bring to our users.


    We appreciate your patience as we work to bring this to fruition. We'll let you know once it moves into active development.


    Thanks for helping us build a better Paessler!


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  3. As a sysadmin or developer I would like to get metrics on the health and performance of the containers within a single Docker runtime so that I can monitor the health of the containers.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,


    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.


    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.


    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.


    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.


    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  4. As a system administrator, I would like my physical devices to be represented in PRTG by a single virtual device in the UI to make things less confusing for me and my colleagues. Unfortunately, for certain devices and sensor technologies (MQTT, controller-managed devices), I need to create a second device in order to specify the address of the MQTT Broker or other "central" controller for sensor queries. Ideally, PRTG would allow the address of a device's controller to be defined in it's settings so that only one device is sufficient. Having one physical device mapped to one PRTG device would…

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,


    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.


    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.


    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.


    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.


    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  5. As a PRTG admin I would like to collect SNMP v3 traps from my devices that support this extra security level. My company and/or customers demand this security step in order to be 100% compliant.

    Affected Application
    PRTG // PRTG Network Monitor // Sensors and Probe

    How does this improve your daily work?
    Hi we got several requests from customers who want to receive SNMPv3 Traps in PRTG.
    At the moment only v1 and v2c traps are possible to be received.

    Our customers request these so to get the software 100% BSI-compliant.
    Otherwise they're refraining from procuring the tool at…

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. As user, I have a lot of alarms which I am aware of. When I restart PRTG, I get flooded with notification emails, stuffing my already full inbox and being an annoyance instead of being helpful.

    I am aware that such option comes with the risk that a new alert might be overlooked. But this is a risk I as a user would take in order to work efficiently with PRTG.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. As a sysadmin I would like to use the discovery and sensor templates in PRTG on a logical group of devices/services that was predefined with tags. This approach would speed up my daily work and reduce manual tasks.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thanks for submitting your idea, to Paessler! We really appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback and help us improve our products.


    Your idea has been successfully received and is now in our review queue. Our team will carefully evaluate it, and we'll keep you updated on its status.


    In the meantime, feel free to share your idea with others to gather more support and comments. The more input we get, the better!


    Thanks again for your contribution.


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  8. As a sysadmin I would like to see the stratum level as integer in the SNTP sensor. That way I can set limits/alerts on it when the required stratum level is not reached.

    The correct stratum level is important for synchronisation of time on different machines.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,


    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.


    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.


    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.


    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.


    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  9. As a system administrator using PRTG,
    I want to configure a file content sensor using simple date placeholders or regex patterns to automatically find the correct log file each day,
    so that monitoring dynamic log files becomes straightforward and less time-consuming.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,


    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.


    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.


    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.


    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.


    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  10. As a PRTG admin deploying multiple sensors we must make manual adjustments after auto discovery we would like to use a template to apply defaults similar to device templates so that we could reduce the manual effort the team does today.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,


    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.


    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.


    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.


    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.


    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  11. As an advanced user, I would like to use a framework in the form of a sensor API. This could be a Python library that allows me to use PRTG's internal SNMP stack with connection establishment, authentication, querying, etc., while also giving me the ability to build advanced SNMP sensors. This allows different OID trees to be combined in the code, which is not possible with SNMP custom sensors. This framework is intended to abstract the complexity of pure SNMP communication and allow developers to focus on logic and data processing.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. As a DevOps Engineer, I need a native PRTG sensor to monitor the health and performance of my custom applications running in Kubernetes, so that I can gain immediate, centralized visibility into their operational status, proactively identify issues at the cluster, pod, and application level, and ensure the continuous availability and performance of my services.

    1. Kubernetes-Aware Monitoring:

      • Ability to target and understand applications deployed via Kubernetes constructs (e.g., Deployments, Pods, Namespaces).
      • Provide insights into the overall health and status of application deployments (e.g., how many instances are running vs. expected).
      • Report on the status and lifecycle of individual application pods…
    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,


    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.


    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.


    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.


    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.


    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  13. As a Windows Admin using PRTG I need to be able to monitor my business processes running as scheduled tasks so that I can ensure my business processes are executing.

    Today this is done via external tools and managing them is not ideal. There was a deprecated sensor for this but nothing really took its place. See https://www.reddit.com/r/prtg/comments/1lececg/if_youre_using_scheduledtask2xmlexe_from_prtg/

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,


    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.


    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.


    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.


    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.


    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  14. As an IT Administrator, I want a native PRTG sensor to conveniently monitor the expiration dates of private and SMTP-TLS certificates, eliminating the need for custom scripts. This will ensure I'm proactively alerted to expiring certificates, preventing service disruptions and security vulnerabilities.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,


    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.


    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.


    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.


    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.


    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  15. As user I want to use the WMI Service sensor with an account which has only read access as long as I use the option "Do not start/restart the service (default)".

    Because the WMI Service sensor has an option to restart the service in case it is not running, the user account for this sensor must be a write user. For optimal security I might want to use read-only accounts for monitoring. This would render the WMI restart option nonfunctional but allow me to not provide PRTG write access just to monitor the running status of a Windows service.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,


    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.


    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.


    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.


    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.


    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  16. As a PRTG user I would like to use the O365 sensor to be able to detect when I get an email with specific text in the subject or body so that I can monitor other processes for errors which are sending emails to report errors. Also, there's currently no option "If No Email Matches the Above Filters" for the MS365 Mailbox sensor as in the IMAP sensor.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,


    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.


    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.


    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.


    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.


    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  17. As a PRTG admin setting up sensors using Sensor Factory we have the need to dynamically update sensors using the API to add tagging to aggregate upstream traffic across links so that I can have the right data for monitoring and reporting purposes due to constant changes in our network.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,


    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.


    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.


    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.


    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.


    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  18. As a syadmin who is a current Prometheus user I would like to get metrics from Prometheus exporters so that I can have my metrics in PRTG along with my other infrastructure data.

    Ideally I could also scrape these from other Prometheus compatible endpoints such as the OpenTelemetry collector.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,


    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.


    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.


    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.


    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.


    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  19. As a Systems Engineer managing servers with outbound-only connectivity, I want HTTP Push Data Advanced sensors to gracefully resume monitoring after maintenance windows by using the most recent push data received during the pause, so that I don't get false alarms and can maintain accurate monitoring continuity during planned maintenance.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,


    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.


    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.


    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.


    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.


    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  20. The Windows Update Sensor in itself is quite useful already, but i would really like another channel returning the time since a given update was available. E.g. one for each criticality ore something alike. Our Customers care much more about how long the updates are already out, not how many there are.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
← Previous 1
  • Don't see your idea?