Skip to content

Sensors

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

63 results found

  1. As a Systems Engineer managing Linux server infrastructure with PRTG, I want a native Linux PSI sensor that reads CPU, memory, and I/O pressure stall metrics directly from /proc/pressure/, so that I can accurately detect resource contention, identify performance bottlenecks earlier, and replace fragile custom SSH script workarounds with a standardized, maintainable monitoring solution.

    Many organizations using PRTG rely on the built-in SNMP Linux Load Average sensor to monitor system load on Linux servers. While this works for basic monitoring, the traditional load average metric has well-known limitations: it only reflects the number of runnable or waiting tasks and does…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thanks for submitting your idea, to Paessler! We really appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback and help us improve our products.

    Your idea has been successfully received and is now in our review queue. Our team will carefully evaluate it, and we'll keep you updated on its status.

    In the meantime, feel free to share your idea with others to gather more support and comments. The more input we get, the better!

    Thanks again for your contribution.

    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  2. As a Systems Engineer managing containerized workloads across different operating systems and environments, I want a dedicated Podman container monitoring sensor in PRTG so that I can monitor the health, status, resource usage, and uptime of my Podman containers, with the same depth and ease that the existing Docker sensor provides for Docker environments.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thanks for submitting your idea, to Paessler! We really appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback and help us improve our products.

    Your idea has been successfully received and is now in our review queue. Our team will carefully evaluate it, and we'll keep you updated on its status.

    In the meantime, feel free to share your idea with others to gather more support and comments. The more input we get, the better!

    Thanks again for your contribution.

    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  3. As a Systems Engineer responsible for monitoring SSL/TLS certificates,
    I want PRTG's SSL Certificate sensor (and related sensors) to support OCSP (Online Certificate Status Protocol) as a standalone certificate revocation verification method,
    so that I can accurately monitor certificate validity and revocation status even when the Certificate Authority no longer provides a CRL (Certificate Revocation List), avoiding false alerts or "Unable to Check Revocation Status" warnings that undermine the reliability of my monitoring setup.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thanks for submitting your idea, to Paessler! We really appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback and help us improve our products.

    Your idea has been successfully received and is now in our review queue. Our team will carefully evaluate it, and we'll keep you updated on its status.

    In the meantime, feel free to share your idea with others to gather more support and comments. The more input we get, the better!

    Thanks again for your contribution.

    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  4. As an IT Infrastructure Manager responsible for disaster recovery operations,
    I want PRTG to integrate with the Zerto Analytics portal to monitor Virtual Protection Groups (VPGs), their size, RPO compliance, and replication health,
    so that I can proactively detect drift in DRaaS protection, ensure business continuity compliance, and receive alerts when disaster recovery SLAs are at risk—all from within my unified PRTG monitoring dashboard.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. As a Systems Engineer responsible for Microsoft Exchange servers,
    I want a native PRTG sensor that can automatically monitor the status and expiration of Microsoft Exchange SMTP certificates (the default self-signed certificate used for internal server-to-server encryption (opportunistic TLS), and a separate "Microsoft Exchange Server Auth Certificate" used for server-to-server authentication (OAuth)),
    so that I can proactively detect certificate expiration or validity issues before they cause email delivery failures, authentication problems, or security vulnerabilities in my Exchange environment.

    Similar requests in the past:
    https://helpdesk.paessler.com/en/support/solutions/articles/76000078074-feature-request-smtp-cetificate-sensor
    and
    https://helpdesk.paessler.com/en/support/solutions/articles/76000076583-feature-request-ssl-certificate-sensor-for-smtp-connector

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,

    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.

    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.

    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.

    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.

    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!

    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  6. As an IT administrator managing VMware infrastructure, I would like a dedicated sensor to monitor virtual machine snapshots in PRTG, so that I can proactively detect and remediate snapshot-related issues before they cause performance degradation or storage outages.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,

    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.

    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.

    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.

    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.

    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!

    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  7. As a system administrator I use several custom sensors. For add new channels, the Value Mode can not be defined in custom sensor script e.g. powershell.
    https://www.paessler.com/manuals/prtg/custom_sensors

    Please add a new tag "ValueMode" with Average/Minimum/Maximum
    https://helpdesk.paessler.com/en/support/solutions/articles/76000063564-what-is-the-value-mode-in-channel-settings-

    Many thanks!

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Problem:
    The SNMP Custom Table Sensor has critical limitations:
    Sensors are named by row identifiers (e.g., "Table: OID / 128.141.183.198.171.212") instead of human-readable names from string columns
    Only one column per sensor - monitoring multiple metrics per table row requires multiple separate sensors
    String columns cannot be used for naming or identification
    This makes monitoring dynamic SNMP tables (APs, interfaces, VPN users) impractical at scale.

    Requested Features:
    1. Automatic Naming from String Columns
    Add option to specify which table column contains sensor names
    Example: Use column .1.3 (AP Name) instead of MAC address
    Result: Sensors named "AP-Office-Floor1" instead of "Table:…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,

    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.

    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.

    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.

    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.

    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!

    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  9. As a System Engineer monitoring large-scale Citrix XenServer environments,
    I want the ability to selectively choose which channels to monitor in the Citrix XenServer Host sensor (e.g., specific CPU cores and hardware components),
    so that I can reduce sensor complexity, improve performance, and maintain a clear overview when monitoring systems with 200+ CPU cores without being overwhelmed by hundreds of unnecessary channels.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Currently, the Azure Storage Account sensor in PRTG only provides metrics at the storage-account level.
    As an IT admin, I need the ability to monitor each Azure File Share separately, including metrics such as used space,
    free space, total capacity, file count, and I/O performance.

    Please introduce a new Azure File Share sensor that queries per-share metrics.

    Possible channels:
    Total capacity
    Used space
    Free space
    File count
    IOPS / throughput
    Ingress / egress

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,

    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.

    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.

    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.

    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.

    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!

    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  11. As a Systems Engineer monitoring secure enterprise services, I want built-in HTTP/HTTPS sensors to support client certificate authentication (mutual TLS), so that I can monitor certificate-protected administrative interfaces, APIs, and customer portals without having to create and maintain custom scripts for each endpoint.

    In secure environments, many web-based services—especially administrative interfaces, APIs, and customer portals—are only accessible via HTTPS with client certificate authentication. These URLs cannot be accessed using standard HTTP/HTTPS sensors in PRTG, as there is currently no way to specify a client certificate and private key.

    Currently, the only workaround is to use custom scripts (e.g., PowerShell or…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. As a Network Engineer, I want native F5 BIG-IP sensors (BIG-IP 17.x): LTM Nodes, Pools, Pool Members, Virtual Servers, and System sensors (CPU, Interface, Disk, Cluster). These sensors must auto-discover objects and create channels dynamically.

    Customer Need:
    Native, out‑of‑the‑box PRTG sensors for F5 BIG‑IP devices, designed similarly to other vendor-specific sensor types (e.g., FortiGate, HPE, NetApp).
    These sensors should provide intelligent auto‑discovery and automatic channel creation, instead of requiring SNMP Custom sensors.

    We expect sensor types that automatically detect and monitor:

    A. LTM Object Sensors (from LOCAL-MIB)
    Each of these should be a dedicated native sensor type:

    F5 LTM Nodes…

    11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. As a Systems Engineer managing a VMware vSphere environment, I want a native PRTG sensor that monitors vCenter alarms directly, so that I can gain complete visibility into the health status of my virtualized infrastructure without relying on third-party scripts or workarounds, ensuring I'm immediately aware of critical issues flagged by vCenter's own alarm system.

    There is a third party sensor (https://github.com/Jannos-443/PRTG-VMware-Alerts), but something this fundamental should be built in.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. As an Infrastructure Administrator managing a mixed IT environment with Multi-Platform Probes, I want the SNMP Custom Table sensor functionality on my Linux-based probes, so that I can efficiently create sensors from SNMP table data

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. As a Systems Engineer, I want HTTP Data Advanced sensors to support placeholders in URL, POST body, and custom headers fields, so that I can centrally manage sensitive credentials and API configurations while maintaining security best practices and reducing sensor configuration complexity.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Currently, PRTG does not provide a way to determine how long a sensor has been in a warning state. This makes it difficult to distinguish between sensors that just entered a warning state and those that have been generating warnings for extended periods (hours, days, or weeks).

    Feature Request:
    Please add warning state duration information to PRTG with the following components:

    API Access (Most Important):
    - Add a "warningduration" or "timeincurrentstate" field to the sensor API endpoints
    - Enable filtering/querying sensors by warning duration via API parameters
    - This would allow for automated reporting and custom…

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. As a PRTG network administrator, I want to monitor SSL certificates for both HTTPS and MS SQL Server connections, so that I can proactively manage certificate expiration across all critical services without relying on complex external scripts.

    Since the current SSL Certificate is only for web (HTTPS) ports, it might be useful to update the name to "HTTPS SSL Certificate".

    Within the scope of MS SQL Server's connection SSL Certificate for the 1433 port, it will be useful to provide a way to monitor the certificate's expiry date. There is a number of pages with Python scripts that will pull…

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. As an IT Infrastructure Manager, I want to schedule PRTG sensors to run at specific times using our local system time (not UTC), so that I can align monitoring activities with our business hours, maintenance windows, and operational schedules without having to calculate time zone conversions.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. As an Enterprise Network Administrator managing Cisco ACI infrastructure I want a dedicated Cisco ACI sensor in PRTG so that I can monitor the health, performance, and status of my Application Centric Infrastructure fabric without needing separate monitoring tools or complex custom scripts.

    Background:
    With the increasing adoption of software-defined networking and the complexity of modern data center environments, customers using Cisco ACI need comprehensive monitoring capabilities. Currently, monitoring ACI requires either expensive third-party tools, custom API integrations, or basic SNMP monitoring that misses critical ACI-specific metrics like fabric health scores, policy compliance, and tenant-specific performance data.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. As a Storage Administrator, I want to add and monitor LUNs with an empty or unset comment field using the LUN v2 sensor in PRTG, so that monitoring coverage is not blocked by optional metadata and I can ensure complete visibility and SLAs across all storage volumes.

    Problem / Context:
    In many storage environments, the comment/description attribute of a LUN is optional and frequently left blank (e.g., when provisioned by automation or 3rd‑party workflows).
    When I attempt to add a LUN v2 sensor for such a LUN, PRTG fails with the error: “Das abgefragte Feld comment ist leer.” (“The queried…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
← Previous 1 3 4
  • Don't see your idea?