Skip to content

Probes

Categories

12 results found

  1. When will there be a 64-bit version for Windows Probe, or a Linux-based MultiProbe with full functionality?
    The 32-bit version is overwhelmed in large environments with multiple remote probes, some with up to 6,000 sensors.

    19 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    In Progress  ·  2 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. As an IT Infrastructure Manager, I want to deploy redundant remote probes that automatically replicate sensor configurations and provide seamless failover capabilities, so that I can ensure continuous monitoring coverage without manual intervention during probe outages and eliminate single points of failure in remote locations.

    In environments where uptime and monitoring continuity are critical — especially in OT and industrial networks — a single PRTG Remote Probe represents a potential single point of failure. Currently, if a probe goes offline, all sensors assigned to it immediately lose visibility until the probe is restored.

    I propose a High Availability (HA) Probe…

    15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. As a Systems Engineer responsible for patching and maintaining our PRTG environment, I want the matching multi-platform probe package to be published at the same time as each PRTG core server release, so that I can patch my entire PRTG environment (core server and all probes) in a single, coordinated maintenance window and keep my patch management process compliant and streamlined.

    Currently, there is one week between the main release and the release of the MPP Version. This causes issues in our patch management which we would like to streamline. It would help for updates to be released immediately.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. As a Systems Engineer managing PRTG multi-platform probes across multiple remote sites, I want multi-platform probes to update automatically from the PRTG core server when the core server is updated — the same way classic remote probes do — so that I don't need to obtain access to each remote system and perform manual package updates, saving time and keeping all probes on compatible, current versions without site-by-site effort.

    Background:
    We have the Multi-platform probe on multiple sites and would like the option to auto-update these sites together with the core-server in the same way the classic remote probe does.…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. As a network administrator at a large company with multiple sub-divisions, I want to organize probes into hierarchical groups by division so that I can better manage and navigate our monitoring infrastructure.
    Division 1
    ├── Probe 1
    │ ├── Group 1
    │ │ ├── Device 1
    │ │ │ ├── Sensor 1
    │ │ │ └── Sensor 2
    │ │ └── Device 2
    │ └── Group 2
    ├── Probe 2
    └── Probe 3

    Division 2
    ├── Probe 1
    ├── Probe 2
    └── Probe 3

    10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. As a Systems Engineer decommissioning Windows hosts, I want a guided tool that maps existing sensors on a classic Windows probe to their equivalent multi-platform probe sensors, transfers their settings, and preserves (or links) their historic data, so that I can migrate my monitoring to Linux-based probes without days of manual re-creation and without losing the history my organization relies on for reporting and trend analysis.

    Background:
    The newly available MPP probe on a linux platform is a good move in the right direction, but we have discovered that sensors can not be moved from Windows probes to MPP probes,…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. For us as an MSP, it is important to be able to define a clear upper limit for the number of sensors that can be used per remote probe.

    Some remote probes run within our customers’ infrastructure. At the same time, customers have write permissions within their probe so they can independently add and manage devices and sensors in their environment. This creates a risk that more sensors may be activated than permitted by the license and billed by us.

    Manually checking the sensor count per customer is no longer a modern approach and is difficult to scale reliably in…

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. As a PRTG Administrator, I want to be able to allow PRTG users in non-administrator groups the ability to download and install remote probes.

    We're an MSP with a wide variety of needs and technical staff, we've sought to develop PRTG groups in conjunction with SSO to better control access to our environment (admins, full control, read-only, etc.).

    During that process we discovered that only select users who are members of the 'Administrators' group - the same group with control over user accounts, groups, and setup settings - have the ability to download and install remote probes to set up…

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Integrate the NATS server and simplify the multi-platform probes installation and set up process with self-signed certificates.

    10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. As a PRTG admin I want to know what sensor types are on each probe. For example if there are heavy probes like WMI running I have a more limited capacity on the probe so having the count would be helpful so that I can manage probe capacity (could be an addition to the PRTG Status page /status.htm?tabid=1).

    10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Organizations with existing Nagios/Icinga deployments have invested significant time and effort in configuring custom checks, plugins, and monitoring logic. Rather than recreating these checks in PRTG, they want to leverage their existing Nagios/Icinga check configurations and push the results directly into PRTG for centralized visibility and management.

    As a Systems Engineer with existing Nagios/Icinga monitoring infrastructure,
    I want a PRTG probe that can receive and process check results from my existing Nagios/Icinga checks,
    so that I can leverage my current monitoring investments and display all check results within PRTG's interface without having to recreate or duplicate my monitoring configurations.

    Desired…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. User Story:
    As a Platform Engineer managing distributed Kubernetes infrastructure,
    I want to deploy PRTG Multi-Platform Probes natively within Kubernetes clusters
    so that I can ensure continuous network monitoring with high availability and reduced infrastructure complexity.

    Acceptance Criteria:
    - PRTG Multi-Platform Probes can be deployed as native Kubernetes resources (e.g., via Helm chart or Operator) without requiring Docker-specific host capabilities.
    - The deployed probes support high availability and auto-recovery.
    - All core probe monitoring features are functional and compatible when running inside Kubernetes, matching the capabilities available on standard Docker or VM-based deployments.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?