Skip to content

Sensors

Categories

53 results found

  1. As a Systems Engineer managing my organization's IT infrastructure with PRTG, I want PRTG to monitor Veeam Backup & Replication job statuses by connecting directly to the Veeam B&R REST API (v13+), so that I can monitor backup jobs without requiring a Veeam Enterprise Manager license or a portal administrator account, reducing both licensing costs and security exposure.

    The current Veeam Backup Job Status (and Advanced) sensors still require and use Veeam Enterprise Manager (and require portal administrator role).

    Would be great to refactor or build new sensors to use/connect directly to the Veeam B&R server instead of the Veeam…

    21 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. As a PRTG user monitoring an Azure environment,
    I want native Azure sensors in PRTG that provide the same depth and coverage as those offered by AutoMonX,
    so that I can monitor my Azure infrastructure comprehensively without relying on a third-party solution, incurring additional costs, or managing a separate contract.

    Background / Context:
    PRTG's current Azure-related sensors cover only basic functionality. While AutoMonX (automonx.com/azure) fills this gap on a commercial basis, prospects and customers increasingly expect a native, fully integrated solution from PRTG itself — one that requires no additional vendor relationship or cost.

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,

    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.

    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.

    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.

    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.

    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!

    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  3. As a Network Engineer, I want PRTG SNMP Traffic sensors to dynamically update interface descriptors (ifAlias, ifDesc, ifName) on every scanning interval while using ifIndex as the primary immutable identifier for port identification, so that sensor names remain accurate and searchable when network device interface descriptions are changed through configuration management.

    In cases where ifAlias, ifDesc, and ifName are used in port name templates, PRTG SNMP Traffic sensors should always pull these values and update them.

    ifIndex should be used by default to identify the ports and the other OIDs should be used as dynamically updating fields on every scanning…

    28 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. As a Systems Engineee,
    I want a built-in/ automatic migration from existing legacy SNMP sensors to their newer v2 sensor equivalents,
    so that I can adopt the improved sensor types without manually recreating hundreds of sensors and without losing my historical monitoring data, alerts, and configurations.

    13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. As a Network Engineer monitoring multi-vendor network infrastructure,
    I want the SNMP Custom Table sensor to support string value handling in its channels (e.g., mapping strings to sensor states or displaying them in the sensor message),
    so that I can monitor all relevant data from SNMP tables - including string-based status fields, names, and descriptors, without needing to create individual string sensors or custom scripts for each OID.

    Background:
    In SNMP Custom Table sensors, it is currently not possible to evaluate string returns within channel strings. The user considers this a notable gap, because string returns are very common in…

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,

    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.

    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.

    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.

    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.

    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!

    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  6. As a Systems Engineer running nginx as my web server, I want a dedicated PRTG sensor that reads nginx's built-in status page and turns it into real-time channels for active connections, request throughput, connection states, and dropped connections, so that I can monitor my web server's actual load and health and get alerted before it starts refusing traffic.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Problem / Current Limitation:
    PRTG's MQTT sensors currently hard-require QoS 2 as a fixed, non-configurable part of their implementation — none of PRTG's available MQTT sensor types offer QoS 0 or QoS 1 as an alternative. QoS 0, 1, and 2 are all standard, valid delivery levels defined by the MQTT protocol itself — a broker or service that only offers QoS 0/1 is not doing anything non-standard or unusual, it's simply choosing a different (and very common) point on the QoS spectrum. By hard-coding QoS 2 across the board, PRTG effectively excludes any MQTT broker or managed service that…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. As a Network Engineer, I want native F5 BIG-IP sensors (BIG-IP 17.x): LTM Nodes, Pools, Pool Members, Virtual Servers, and System sensors (CPU, Interface, Disk, Cluster). These sensors must auto-discover objects and create channels dynamically.

    Customer Need:
    Native, out‑of‑the‑box PRTG sensors for F5 BIG‑IP devices, designed similarly to other vendor-specific sensor types (e.g., FortiGate, HPE, NetApp).
    These sensors should provide intelligent auto‑discovery and automatic channel creation, instead of requiring SNMP Custom sensors.

    We expect sensor types that automatically detect and monitor:

    A. LTM Object Sensors (from LOCAL-MIB)
    Each of these should be a dedicated native sensor type:

    F5 LTM Nodes…

    15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. As a PRTG network administrator, I want to monitor SSL certificates for both HTTPS and MS SQL Server connections, so that I can proactively manage certificate expiration across all critical services without relying on complex external scripts.

    Since the current SSL Certificate is only for web (HTTPS) ports, it might be useful to update the name to "HTTPS SSL Certificate".

    Within the scope of MS SQL Server's connection SSL Certificate for the 1433 port, it will be useful to provide a way to monitor the certificate's expiry date. There is a number of pages with Python scripts that will pull…

    15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. As an Enterprise Network Administrator managing Cisco ACI infrastructure I want a dedicated Cisco ACI sensor in PRTG so that I can monitor the health, performance, and status of my Application Centric Infrastructure fabric without needing separate monitoring tools or complex custom scripts.

    Background:
    With the increasing adoption of software-defined networking and the complexity of modern data center environments, customers using Cisco ACI need comprehensive monitoring capabilities. Currently, monitoring ACI requires either expensive third-party tools, custom API integrations, or basic SNMP monitoring that misses critical ACI-specific metrics like fabric health scores, policy compliance, and tenant-specific performance data.

    15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Currently, PRTG does not provide a way to determine how long a sensor has been in a warning state. This makes it difficult to distinguish between sensors that just entered a warning state and those that have been generating warnings for extended periods (hours, days, or weeks).

    Feature Request:
    Please add warning state duration information to PRTG with the following components:

    API Access (Most Important):
    - Add a "warningduration" or "timeincurrentstate" field to the sensor API endpoints
    - Enable filtering/querying sensors by warning duration via API parameters
    - This would allow for automated reporting and custom…

    12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. As a PRTG admin I would like to collect SNMP v3 traps from my devices that support this extra security level. My company and/or customers demand this security step in order to be 100% compliant.

    Affected Application
    PRTG // PRTG Network Monitor // Sensors and Probe

    How does this improve your daily work?
    Hi we got several requests from customers who want to receive SNMPv3 Traps in PRTG.
    At the moment only v1 and v2c traps are possible to be received.

    Our customers request these so to get the software 100% BSI-compliant.
    Otherwise they're refraining from procuring the tool at…

    29 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. As a Systems Engineer who builds custom integrations (e.g., wrapping NRPE/Nagios plugin output for PRTG via a web server),
    I want the XML processing of the HTTP Data Advanced sensor (and related advanced custom sensors) to behave like a real, standards-compliant XML parser — accepting comments, matching values to channels by name rather than position, and letting me explicitly designate the primary channel —
    so that I can generate sensor output from any standard tool or library (hash tables, XSLT, alphabetically sorted REST responses) without fragile ordering hacks, and get consistent results regardless of which sensor type consumes the data.

    …

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. As a Systems Engineer responsible for virtualization infrastructure, I want PRTG's Citrix XenServer Host and Virtual Machine sensors to fully support TLS 1.2 or higher, so that I can monitor my XenServer hosts and VMs without weakening the hypervisor's security configuration or losing visibility as older TLS versions are deprecated.

    Background:
    The current Citrix sensors do not support TLS 1.2 or higher. Since older TLS versions are being phased out and not supported, the current sensors need to be updated, or new sensors need to be created.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Currently, the Azure Storage Account sensor in PRTG only provides metrics at the storage-account level.
    As an IT admin, I need the ability to monitor each Azure File Share separately, including metrics such as used space,
    free space, total capacity, file count, and I/O performance.

    Please introduce a new Azure File Share sensor that queries per-share metrics.

    Possible channels:
    Total capacity
    Used space
    Free space
    File count
    IOPS / throughput
    Ingress / egress

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. As a Systems Engineer managing a large or frequently changing PRTG environment, I want to define a sensor tag as a dynamic filter for a Business Process channel, so that sensors are automatically added to or removed from the channel when their tags change — eliminating manual reconfiguration of Business Process Sensors every time the environment changes.

    Background:
    Business Process Sensor configurations are currently largely static. Sensors have to be manually assigned to individual Business Process channels.
    For larger PRTG environments, it would be very useful to have the option to dynamically populate Business Process channels based on sensor tags.…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. As a Systems Engineer setting up Business Process Sensors with many underlying sensors, I want to add multiple sensors to a BP channel in one operation — via multi-select in the device tree or by pasting a list of sensor IDs — so that I can configure large Business Processes in minutes instead of adding each of e.g. 50 sensors individually.

    Background:
    When configuring a Business Process Sensor, sensors currently have to be added one by one, either by entering the sensor ID or by selecting each sensor individually from the Device Tree.
    This becomes extremely time-consuming when a Business…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. As a Systems Engineer validating or troubleshooting a Business Process Sensor configuration, I want the list of assigned sensors per channel to display the full object path (probe, device, sensor name, sensor ID, and optionally sensor status) with sorting and filtering, so that I can immediately identify which sensor belongs to which device without looking up each sensor ID individually.

    Background:
    When configuring a Business Process (BP) Sensor, the objects assigned to a channel are currently displayed mainly by sensor name and sensor ID. For larger Business Process Sensors, this makes it difficult to see which device and probe a…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Problem:
    The SNMP Custom Table Sensor has critical limitations:
    Sensors are named by row identifiers (e.g., "Table: OID / 128.141.183.198.171.212") instead of human-readable names from string columns
    Only one column per sensor - monitoring multiple metrics per table row requires multiple separate sensors
    String columns cannot be used for naming or identification
    This makes monitoring dynamic SNMP tables (APs, interfaces, VPN users) impractical at scale.

    Requested Features:
    1. Automatic Naming from String Columns
    Add option to specify which table column contains sensor names
    Example: Use column .1.3 (AP Name) instead of MAC address
    Result: Sensors named "AP-Office-Floor1" instead of "Table:…

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. As a Network Engineer, I want to see a 'Used Memory (%)' channel alongside the existing 'Available Memory' channel in the SNMP Cisco System Health sensor, so that I can choose the metric that best fits my alerting thresholds and dashboards.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
← Previous 1 3
  • Don't see your idea?