Skip to content

Sensors

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

43 results found

  1. As an IT Infrastructure Manager migrating from Dell EMC Unity to Dell PowerStore storage systems, I want native PRTG sensors for PowerStore monitoring (equivalent to current Unity sensors) plus dedicated replication health monitoring, so that I can maintain comprehensive storage visibility without manual REST API configuration.

    PRTG has a lot of useful sensors for the Dell EMC Unity storage, which we are glad to have. Unfortunately Dell announced their end of sale in August 2025 and for the first hardware generation their end of service in July 2026.

    The successor to Unity is the PowerStore storage system. Unfortunately the only…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thanks for submitting your idea, to Paessler! We really appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback and help us improve our products.


    Your idea has been successfully received and is now in our review queue. Our team will carefully evaluate it, and we'll keep you updated on its status.


    In the meantime, feel free to share your idea with others to gather more support and comments. The more input we get, the better!


    Thanks again for your contribution.


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  2. As a Systems Engineer, I want Script v2 sensors to support built-in PRTG placeholders (like %snmpcommunity) so that my scripts can automatically access device credentials without manual configuration (so that Script v2 sensors can do all of the same work that older script sensors could do).

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thanks for submitting your idea, to Paessler! We really appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback and help us improve our products.


    Your idea has been successfully received and is now in our review queue. Our team will carefully evaluate it, and we'll keep you updated on its status.


    In the meantime, feel free to share your idea with others to gather more support and comments. The more input we get, the better!


    Thanks again for your contribution.


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  3. As a Systems Engineer managing NetApp storage infrastructure, I want a dedicated sensor to monitor FlexCache volumes so that I can track their performance, capacity, and cache efficiency, ensuring complete visibility across my storage environment.
    Currently, they are not supported, and PRTG identifies them as normal volumes, so it gives the error "400 (bad request)".

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thanks for submitting your idea, to Paessler! We really appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback and help us improve our products.


    Your idea has been successfully received and is now in our review queue. Our team will carefully evaluate it, and we'll keep you updated on its status.


    In the meantime, feel free to share your idea with others to gather more support and comments. The more input we get, the better!


    Thanks again for your contribution.


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  4. As a Network Engineer monitoring network infrastructures with GRE tunneling, I want the sFlow sensor to sample GRE (IP protocol 47) traffic so that I can gain complete visibility into all network traffic flows, including tunneled traffic. Currently, PRTG sFlow sensor only samples UDP and TCP traffic.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thanks for submitting your idea, to Paessler! We really appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback and help us improve our products.


    Your idea has been successfully received and is now in our review queue. Our team will carefully evaluate it, and we'll keep you updated on its status.


    In the meantime, feel free to share your idea with others to gather more support and comments. The more input we get, the better!


    Thanks again for your contribution.


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  5. As a Systems Engineer monitoring APIs with PRTG, I want sensors to automatically renew expired authentication tokens so that I don't have to manually update credentials

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thanks for submitting your idea, to Paessler! We really appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback and help us improve our products.


    Your idea has been successfully received and is now in our review queue. Our team will carefully evaluate it, and we'll keep you updated on its status.


    In the meantime, feel free to share your idea with others to gather more support and comments. The more input we get, the better!


    Thanks again for your contribution.


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  6. As a network engineer managing devices from ISPs and vendors with restricted SNMP configurations, I want PRTG to support SNMPv3 authNoPriv mode (authentication without encryption) so that I can monitor critical infrastructure devices that only allow this security level.

    Currently, PRTG only supports SNMPv3 with authPriv (authentication + encryption). Many providers, e.g. Telekom, only offer SNMPv3 in authNoPriv mode.

    Example configuration (as provided by Telekom, not changeable):
    Mode: authNoPriv
    Authentication Protocol: MD5
    Privacy (Encryption): None

    Since PRTG does not support authNoPriv, monitoring such devices is currently impossible.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,


    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.


    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.


    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.


    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.


    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  7. As a Cloud/ DevOps engineer, I want to have sensors for Google Cloud Platform (GCP) similar to those available for Azure, so that I can monitor and manage my GCP infrastructure with the same level of visibility and control that I have for Azure environments.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,


    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.


    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.


    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.


    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.


    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  8. As a systems engineer, I want to monitor groups of related Windows services in a single sensor so that I can quickly identify if any critical service group is not running properly without having to create and manage multiple individual service sensors.
    Examples:
    - services set with "automatic start"
    - multiple services with a specific name in it (e.g. all backup services)

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thanks for submitting your idea, to Paessler! We really appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback and help us improve our products.


    Your idea has been successfully received and is now in our review queue. Our team will carefully evaluate it, and we'll keep you updated on its status.


    In the meantime, feel free to share your idea with others to gather more support and comments. The more input we get, the better!


    Thanks again for your contribution.


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  9. As a Network Engineer, I want the RADIUS v2 sensor to support RFC 3579 Message-Authenticator validation so that I can monitor RADIUS servers with enhanced security and ensure authentication packet integrity in my network infrastructure. The client (PRTG Sensor) computes the hash (HMAC-MD5) from its own packet and then adds the attribute as a signature to the request. This is required for secure implementations of RADIUS.

    https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security-vpn/remote-authentication-dial-user-service-radius/118673-technote-radius-00.html

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thanks for submitting your idea, to Paessler! We really appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback and help us improve our products.


    Your idea has been successfully received and is now in our review queue. Our team will carefully evaluate it, and we'll keep you updated on its status.


    In the meantime, feel free to share your idea with others to gather more support and comments. The more input we get, the better!


    Thanks again for your contribution.


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  10. I would like to be able to set limits per channel in code when using the Script V2 Python sensor. This used to be possible with the Python Advanced sensor by adding attributes such as the following when adding the channel to the result JSON in Python:

    islimitmode=True,
    limitminerror=10,
    limitmaxerror=90,
    limiterrormsg="Percentage too high".

    I have attached the full Python Advanced sensor example where the excerpt above was taken from.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,


    Exciting news! Your idea is now in progress! Our team has started working on bringing this feature/improvement to life.


    We're diligently developing and testing, and we'll keep you updated on our progress. We're excited about the positive impact this will have for Paessler users.


    Thanks for your patience and for helping us enhance our products.


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  11. As a Systems Engineer, I want to retain multiple historical debug results, when the option "Result Handling -> Store result" is enabled in the HTTP Data Advanced sensor settings, so that I can compare different responses over time without losing debugging information between sensor scans. For now only the last result is stored.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,


    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.


    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.


    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.


    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.


    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  12. As a Network Engineer, I want PRTG's SNMP Traffic sensor to include additional channels that track maximum bandwidth values (In/Out) over configurable time periods, so that I can accurately assess true network capacity utilization for effective capacity planning and infrastructure decision-making.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,


    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.


    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.


    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.


    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.


    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  13. As a Network Engineer, I want to monitor Certificate Transparency logs for my organization's domains so that I can detect unauthorized certificate issuance and maintain visibility over our certificate ecosystem in an era of automated certificate management.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,


    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.


    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.


    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.


    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.


    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  14. As a Network Engineer managing critical network infrastructure, I want the SNMP Interface Traffic sensor to include an 'Interface Last Change' channel that monitors the ifLastChange timestamp, so that I can detect interface flapping and instability without having to create separate custom sensors for each interface or rely on SNMP traps.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,


    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.


    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.


    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.


    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.


    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  15. As a Network Engineer, I want to monitor interface speeds (ifSpeed) as additional channels in SNMP Traffic sensors so that I can detect speed mismatches, auto-negotiation failures, and hardware issues without creating multiple custom sensors for each interface.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,


    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.


    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.


    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.


    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.


    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  16. As a Systems Engineer managing servers with outbound-only connectivity, I want HTTP Push Data Advanced sensors to gracefully resume monitoring after maintenance windows by using the most recent push data received during the pause, so that I don't get false alarms and can maintain accurate monitoring continuity during planned maintenance.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,


    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.


    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.


    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.


    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.


    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  17. As a System Administrator responsible for security compliance, I want to see how long Windows updates of different criticality levels have been available so that I can prioritize patching efforts based on both severity and exposure duration, ensuring compliance requirements are met and security risks are minimized.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,


    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.


    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.


    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.


    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.


    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  18. As a Systems Engineer/IT Administrator, I want to use PowerShell 7 as the execution environment for PRTG custom sensors so that I can leverage modern PowerShell features, improve script performance, and eliminate compatibility workarounds in my monitoring solutions.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,


    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.


    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.


    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.


    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.


    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  19. As a Systems Engineer managing multiple servers with multiple disk volumes, I want to configure disk space threshold triggers that apply to ANY partition across servers in a group so that I can efficiently monitor disk space without spending weeks manually configuring individual partition thresholds.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi there,


    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.


    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.


    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.


    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.


    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

  20. As an IT Infrastructure Manager migrating from VMware to XCP-ng, I want native PRTG sensors for XCP-ng hosts and XOA management so that I can maintain comprehensive virtualization monitoring without losing visibility or requiring custom development work during and after migration.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    I have a couple of additional questions to make this more solid as we collect votes on this request :


    1. Which specific XCP-ng metrics are most critical for your monitoring needs?
    2. Do you need XOA-specific monitoring (backup jobs, user sessions) or primarily hypervisor metrics?


    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.


    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.


    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.


    The more engagement…

← Previous 1 3
  • Don't see your idea?