Skip to content

Sensors

Categories

8 results found

  1. As a Systems Engineer running a Proxmox VE cluster,
    I want PRTG's Proxmox VM monitoring to automatically detect and follow a virtual machine when it migrates to a different cluster node,
    so that I receive accurate up/down status for the VM (including VMs I cannot monitor directly, e.g., in a DMZ) without false errors or manual sensor reconfiguration after routine host patching and migrations.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Review  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. As a Network Engineer responsible for switch and bandwidth monitoring,
    I want to filter the interface list in the SNMP sensor creation dialog by monitoring status — specifically to show only interfaces that do not yet have a sensor (and optionally hide those that do) —
    so that I can quickly identify and add recently connected or overlooked ports without manually cross-checking the full interface list against existing sensors, avoiding both wasted time and accidental duplicate sensors.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Review  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. As a Network Engineer managing devices discovered via PRTG auto-discovery,
    I want auto-discovery (including the default templates Generic Device (Ping Only) and Generic Device (SNMP Enabled)) to create ping sensors whose sensor type label matches their actual channel structure, settings, and documented functionality — i.e., a sensor labeled Ping v2 behaves as documented for Ping v2, or a sensor with Ping v1 behavior is labeled Ping v1,
    so that I can trust that sensors were created correctly, reliably filter and manage sensors by type, and avoid wasting time investigating "broken" sensors that are actually just mislabeled.

    Background:
    In PRTG 26.3.122.1665,…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. As a Systems Engineer managing a large or frequently changing PRTG environment, I want to define a sensor tag as a dynamic filter for a Business Process channel, so that sensors are automatically added to or removed from the channel when their tags change — eliminating manual reconfiguration of Business Process Sensors every time the environment changes.

    Background:
    Business Process Sensor configurations are currently largely static. Sensors have to be manually assigned to individual Business Process channels.
    For larger PRTG environments, it would be very useful to have the option to dynamically populate Business Process channels based on sensor tags.…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. As a Systems Engineer setting up Business Process Sensors with many underlying sensors, I want to add multiple sensors to a BP channel in one operation — via multi-select in the device tree or by pasting a list of sensor IDs — so that I can configure large Business Processes in minutes instead of adding each of e.g. 50 sensors individually.

    Background:
    When configuring a Business Process Sensor, sensors currently have to be added one by one, either by entering the sensor ID or by selecting each sensor individually from the Device Tree.
    This becomes extremely time-consuming when a Business…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. As a Systems Engineer validating or troubleshooting a Business Process Sensor configuration, I want the list of assigned sensors per channel to display the full object path (probe, device, sensor name, sensor ID, and optionally sensor status) with sorting and filtering, so that I can immediately identify which sensor belongs to which device without looking up each sensor ID individually.

    Background:
    When configuring a Business Process (BP) Sensor, the objects assigned to a channel are currently displayed mainly by sensor name and sensor ID. For larger Business Process Sensors, this makes it difficult to see which device and probe a…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. As a Systems Engineer running PRTG multi-platform probes on Linux in environments without Windows probe systems, I want more essential sensors, for example, native NTP/SNTP and LDAP(S) sensors to be available on the multi-platform probe,
    so that I can monitor time synchronization and directory service availability — two services critical for authentication and infrastructure health — directly from my Linux probes, without maintaining a Windows remote probe or building custom script workarounds.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. As a Systems Engineer monitoring Proxmox hypervisors with both native PRTG sensors and custom EXE/Script Advanced (PowerShell) sensors, I want the device-level "Credentials for Proxmox" fields (API Token ID, Secret, Port) to be available as placeholders (e.g., %proxmoxtokenid, %proxmoxtokensecret, %proxmoxport) in my script parameters, so that I maintain the API token in one single place and token rotation no longer requires redundant, error-prone updates across two credential sections.

    Background:
    We heavily rely on Custom EXE/Script Advanced Sensors (PowerShell) to monitor our hypervisors for specific metrics, like aging snapshots. While migrating to Proxmox, we noticed that we cannot pass the newly…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?