12 results found

1. Integrated Endpoint Patch Management Module for PRTG

   As an IT Systems Engineer, I want an integrated patch management module within PRTG that can deploy, schedule, and manage patches across my endpoints, so that I can proactively maintain system security and compliance from a single monitoring platform without needing separate patch management tools. It can be a new paid module.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   Declined  ·  AdminIsidora Jeremic (Admin, Paessler) responded

   Hi there,

   
   

   Thank you again for submitting your idea to Paessler. We truly appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback.

   
   

   After careful consideration by our team, we've decided to decline this idea at this time. This decision was made based on several factors, which may include:

   • It doesn't align with our current product roadmap or strategic priorities.
   • The resources required for implementation outweigh the current projected benefits for our user base.
   • There are technical limitations that prevent us from moving forward.
   • A similar feature is already available or planned in a different way.

   
   

   While this particular idea won't be moving forward, please don't be discouraged! Your input is incredibly valuable, and we encourage you to continue sharing your thoughts and ideas with us.

   
   

   Thanks for your understanding and for helping us shape the future of Paessler.

   
   

   Best regards,

   The Paessler Product Team

2. AI-Powered Predictive Monitoring and Intelligent Network Analytics for PRTG

   As an IT Infrastructure Manager, I want AI-powered predictive analytics and intelligent anomaly detection integrated directly into PRTG so that I can proactively prevent outages, reduce troubleshooting time, and provide executive-level insights on infrastructure health without needing to manually analyze complex monitoring data.

   Key Benefits:

   • Anomaly detection:
     
     Use AI models to identify unusual traffic patterns, latency spikes, or device behavior that may indicate security threats or system failures.

   • Predictive Analytics:
     
     Forecast potential outages or performance degradation based on historical data trends, enabling preemptive action.

   • Automated Root Cause Analysis:
     AI can correlate alerts across sensors and logs to suggest likely causes, reducing troubleshooting time.

   • Smart Alerting:
     
     Reduce alert fatigue by using AI to prioritize and suppress non-critical alerts based on context and historical resolution patterns.

   • Natural Language Interface:
     
     Enable users to query system status or generate reports using conversational language (e.g., “Show me bandwidth usage for the last 7 days”).

   Suggested implementation:

   • Integrate with existing machine learning platforms or offer built-in models trained on network telemetry.
   • Provide APIs for custom AI workflows.
   • Offer a dashboard module for AI-driven insights and recommendations.

   Use cases:

   • Detecting DDoS attacks or rogue devices in real time.
   • Forecasting bandwidth saturation during peak hours.
   • Automatically recommending sensor configurations based on network topology.

   As an IT Infrastructure Manager, I want AI-powered predictive analytics and intelligent anomaly detection integrated directly into PRTG so that I can proactively prevent outages, reduce troubleshooting time, and provide executive-level insights on infrastructure health without needing to manually analyze complex monitoring data.

   Key Benefits:

   • Anomaly detection:
     
     Use AI models to identify unusual traffic patterns, latency spikes, or device behavior that may indicate security threats or system failures.

   • Predictive Analytics:
     
     Forecast potential outages or performance degradation based on historical data trends, enabling preemptive action.

   • Automated Root Cause Analysis:
     AI can correlate alerts across sensors and logs to suggest likely causes,… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   Declined  ·  AdminJonah Kowall (SVP Product and Design, Paessler) responded

   Hi there,

   
   

   Thank you again for submitting your idea to Paessler. We truly appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback.

   
   

   The product already provides anomaly detection and other capabilities in what you have today : https://blog.paessler.com/paessler-prtgs-predictive-and-proactive-ai-features

   
   

   We have a lot more planned to modernize the notification system (likely in 2027 for general availability). This will include a lot of the alerting feedback you have provided.

   
   

   Next year (2026) we will be working on new dashboarding to modernize maps and reports. This should address some of your needs (query language and nautral language).

   
   

   If you'd like to provide more specific feedback for a single feature we are happy to hear it.

   
   

   While this particular idea won't be moving forward, please don't be discouraged! Your input is incredibly valuable, and we encourage you to continue sharing your thoughts and ideas with us.

   
   

   Thanks for your understanding and for helping us shape the future of Paessler.

   
   

   Best regards,

   The Paessler Product Team

   Hi there,

   
   

   Thank you again for submitting your idea to Paessler. We truly appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback.

   
   

   The product already provides anomaly detection and other capabilities in what you have today : https://blog.paessler.com/paessler-prtgs-predictive-and-proactive-ai-features

   
   

   We have a lot more planned to modernize the notification system (likely in 2027 for general availability). This will include a lot of the alerting feedback you have provided.

   
   

   Next year (2026) we will be working on new dashboarding to modernize maps and reports. This should address some of your needs (query language and nautral language).

   
   

   If you'd like to provide more specific feedback for a single feature we are happy to hear it.

   
   

   While this particular idea won't be moving forward, please don't be discouraged! Your input is incredibly valuable, and we encourage you to continue sharing your thoughts and ideas with us.

   
   

   Thanks for your understanding and for helping us… more

3. Provide Visio Stencils Support for PRTG Maps and Downloadable Visio Stencils for PRTG Icons Directly from PRTG

   When designing solution architectures or documentation, many of us include PRTG components (Core Server, Probes, Sensors, etc.) in Microsoft Visio diagrams.
   Currently, there are no official Visio stencils or icon sets available for PRTG, forcing users to either create custom graphics or use inaccurate representations.

   I propose adding an option to download official PRTG Visio stencils directly from within the PRTG installation (for example, via the web interface or a “Resources” menu).
   The stencil pack could include:

   Core Server, Probe, Remote Probe icons

   Common sensor and channel symbols

   Status indicators (up, warning, down)

   This would help system integrators, consultants, and designers create professional and consistent documentation that visually aligns with PRTG’s own interface.
   Including these stencils within the installation ensures version consistency and makes it easier for teams to illustrate and standardize PRTG deployments in client presentations and network diagrams.

   When designing solution architectures or documentation, many of us include PRTG components (Core Server, Probes, Sensors, etc.) in Microsoft Visio diagrams.
   Currently, there are no official Visio stencils or icon sets available for PRTG, forcing users to either create custom graphics or use inaccurate representations.

   I propose adding an option to download official PRTG Visio stencils directly from within the PRTG installation (for example, via the web interface or a “Resources” menu).
   The stencil pack could include:

   Core Server, Probe, Remote Probe icons

   Common sensor and channel symbols

   Status indicators (up, warning, down)

   This would help system integrators, consultants, and… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   Declined  ·  AdminIsidora Jeremic (Admin, Paessler) responded

   Hi there,

   
   

   Thank you again for submitting your idea to Paessler. We truly appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback.

   
   

   After careful consideration by our team, we've decided to decline this idea at this time. This decision was made based on several factors, which may include:

   • It doesn't align with our current product roadmap or strategic priorities.
   • The resources required for implementation outweigh the current projected benefits for our user base.
   • There are technical limitations that prevent us from moving forward.
   • A similar feature is already available or planned in a different way.

   
   

   While this particular idea won't be moving forward, please don't be discouraged! Your input is incredibly valuable, and we encourage you to continue sharing your thoughts and ideas with us.

   
   

   Thanks for your understanding and for helping us shape the future of Paessler.

   
   

   Best regards,

   The Paessler Product Team

4. Centralized Multi-User Licensing for PRTG MultiBoard

   As an IT Operations Manager, I want to deploy PRTG MultiBoard on a shared server with a single license that covers multiple users so that my team can access monitoring dashboards without individual license activation requirements, reducing administrative overhead and improving user access efficiency.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   Declined  ·  AdminDaniel Elsner (Product Manager, Paessler) responded

   Hi there,

   
   

   Thank you again for submitting your idea to Paessler. We truly appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback.

   
   

   After careful consideration by our team, we've decided to decline this idea at this time. This decision was made based on several factors, which may include:

   • It doesn't align with our current product roadmap or strategic priorities.
   • The resources required for implementation outweigh the current projected benefits for our user base.
   • There are technical limitations that prevent us from moving forward.
   • A similar feature is already available or planned in a different way.

   
   

   We release config share in MultiBoard that will help you and your team to share configuration between each other. Maybe that will also help you in your use case.

   
   

   While this particular idea won't be moving forward, please don't be discouraged! Your input is incredibly valuable, and we encourage you to continue sharing your thoughts and ideas with us.

   
   

   Thanks for your understanding and for helping us shape the future of Paessler.

   
   

   Best regards,

   The Paessler Product Team

   Hi there,

   
   

   Thank you again for submitting your idea to Paessler. We truly appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback.

   
   

   After careful consideration by our team, we've decided to decline this idea at this time. This decision was made based on several factors, which may include:

   • It doesn't align with our current product roadmap or strategic priorities.
   • The resources required for implementation outweigh the current projected benefits for our user base.
   • There are technical limitations that prevent us from moving forward.
   • A similar feature is already available or planned in a different way.

   
   

   We release config share in MultiBoard that will help you and your team to share configuration between each other. Maybe that will also help you in your use case.

   
   

   While this particular idea won't be moving forward, please don't be discouraged! Your input is incredibly valuable, and we encourage you to continue sharing your thoughts… more

5. Ai

   having llm natural language to do queries and also having predictive analytics forecasting using ai for observability.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   Declined  ·  AdminJonah Kowall (SVP Product and Design, Paessler) responded

   Hi there,

   
   

   Thank you again for submitting your idea to Paessler. We truly appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback.

   
   

   After careful consideration by our team, we've decided to decline this idea at this time. This is due to this idea being too broad. As mentioned we have plans around AI driven dashboarding and insights, but as you know LLMs are cloud only realistically so this will be part of our forthcoming cloud portal which is in development.

   
   

   Thanks for your understanding and for helping us shape the future of Paessler.

   
   

   Best regards,

   The Paessler Product Team

6. To add network configuration management feature.

   This is a very much widely requested features among the enterprises and governments. NCM is also available as a add on feature for other network monitoring tools. Can you consider to have this add on?

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   Declined  ·  AdminJonah Kowall (SVP Product and Design, Paessler) responded

   Hi there,

   
   

   Thank you again for submitting your idea to Paessler. We truly appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback.

   
   

   This is a market we could enter if the opportunity presents itself (interesting acquisition) however we are not planning to build this capability ourselves. The logic behind that decision is that more and more vendors are now part of networks including cloud providers, SASE, CDNs, and other overlays. Orchestrating network changes is not the same as it was 10 years ago when we had 4 primary vendors.

   
   

   After careful consideration by our team, we've decided to decline this idea at this time.

   
   

   While this particular idea won't be moving forward, please don't be discouraged! Your input is incredibly valuable, and we encourage you to continue sharing your thoughts and ideas with us.

   
   

   Thanks for your understanding and for helping us shape the future of Paessler.

   
   

   Best regards,

   The Paessler Product Team

7. PRTG Enterprise Monitor - No downtime during updates

   For PRTG Enterprise Monitor, with a cluster, there should be no downtime during updates but due to the automatic update process, there is a documented downtime requirement.
   If the communication path and protocol between the master-node, failover and remote probes remain static, then should be able to update the master-node and failover node independently of each other, thus not requiring a downtime, no matter how brief.
   Or have a node within the Cluster that is independent of the master-node and failover node, that is not updated automatically to maintain monitoring and also provide for a way to revert in case the update is faulty or is not operational.

   For PRTG Enterprise Monitor, with a cluster, there should be no downtime during updates but due to the automatic update process, there is a documented downtime requirement.
   If the communication path and protocol between the master-node, failover and remote probes remain static, then should be able to update the master-node and failover node independently of each other, thus not requiring a downtime, no matter how brief.
   Or have a node within the Cluster that is independent of the master-node and failover node, that is not updated automatically to maintain monitoring and also provide for a way to revert in case… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   Declined  ·  AdminJonah Kowall (SVP Product and Design, Paessler) responded

   Hi there,

   
   

   Thank you again for submitting your idea to Paessler. We truly appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback.

   
   

   We will not be enhancing the existing cluster mode the way it exists today. We are launching a new PRTG Database later this year, and we will have a far more robust clustering capability next year based on PostgreSQL based replication. Please get back in touch if you have additional feedback for the team.

   
   

   After careful consideration by our team, we've decided to decline this idea at this time. This decision was made based on several factors, which may include:

   • It doesn't align with our current product roadmap or strategic priorities.
   • The resources required for implementation outweigh the current projected benefits for our user base.
   • There are technical limitations that prevent us from moving forward.
   • A similar feature is already available or planned in a different way.

   
   

   While this particular idea won't be moving forward, please don't be discouraged! Your input is incredibly valuable, and we encourage you to continue sharing your thoughts and ideas with us.

   
   

   Thanks for your understanding and for helping us shape the future of Paessler.

   
   

   Best regards,

   The Paessler Product Team

   Hi there,

   
   

   Thank you again for submitting your idea to Paessler. We truly appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback.

   
   

   We will not be enhancing the existing cluster mode the way it exists today. We are launching a new PRTG Database later this year, and we will have a far more robust clustering capability next year based on PostgreSQL based replication. Please get back in touch if you have additional feedback for the team.

   
   

   After careful consideration by our team, we've decided to decline this idea at this time. This decision was made based on several factors, which may include:

   • It doesn't align with our current product roadmap or strategic priorities.
   • The resources required for implementation outweigh the current projected benefits for our user base.
   • There are technical limitations that prevent us from moving forward.
   • A similar feature is already available or planned in a different way.

   
   

   While… more

8. PRTG Desktop for ARM based Linux architecture

   I want to use a Raspberry Pi 5 to show the Desktopapp on a Monitor in our Room.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   Declined  ·  AdminJonah Kowall (SVP Product and Design, Paessler) responded

   Hi there,

   
   

   Thank you again for submitting your idea to Paessler. We truly appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback.

   
   

   Please use the web application versus the desktop applications. We are moving away from desktop entirely in the next year. If there is a reason you cannot use a web application please email me back. Thank you.

   
   

   After careful consideration by our team, we've decided to decline this idea at this time. This decision was made based on several factors, which may include:

   • It doesn't align with our current product roadmap or strategic priorities.
   • The resources required for implementation outweigh the current projected benefits for our user base.
   • There are technical limitations that prevent us from moving forward.
   • A similar feature is already available or planned in a different way.

   
   

   While this particular idea won't be moving forward, please don't be discouraged! Your input is incredibly valuable, and we encourage you to continue sharing your thoughts and ideas with us.

   
   

   Thanks for your understanding and for helping us shape the future of Paessler.

   
   

   Best regards,

   The Paessler Product Team

   Hi there,

   
   

   Thank you again for submitting your idea to Paessler. We truly appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback.

   
   

   Please use the web application versus the desktop applications. We are moving away from desktop entirely in the next year. If there is a reason you cannot use a web application please email me back. Thank you.

   
   

   After careful consideration by our team, we've decided to decline this idea at this time. This decision was made based on several factors, which may include:

   • It doesn't align with our current product roadmap or strategic priorities.
   • The resources required for implementation outweigh the current projected benefits for our user base.
   • There are technical limitations that prevent us from moving forward.
   • A similar feature is already available or planned in a different way.

   
   

   While this particular idea won't be moving forward, please don't be discouraged! Your input is incredibly valuable, and… more

9. Integrate dynamic map

   I would like to see the map part evolve so it can be more dynamic in generating the equipment and their interconnexion (showing who is connected to who, at the switch/port level if snmp details are provided). the more information are provided, the clearer the IT infrastructure map appears.
   This feature can be a game changer regarding the other solution.
   Waiting for this to happen sooner than later.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   Declined  ·  AdminJonah Kowall (SVP Product and Design, Paessler) responded

   Hi there,

   
   

   Thank you again for submitting your idea to Paessler. We truly appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback.

   
   

   After careful consideration by our team, we've decided to decline this idea at this time. This decision was made based on several factors, which may include:

   • It doesn't align with our current product roadmap or strategic priorities.
   • The resources required for implementation outweigh the current projected benefits for our user base.
   • There are technical limitations that prevent us from moving forward.
   • A similar feature is already available or planned in a different way.

   
   

   While this particular idea won't be moving forward, please don't be discouraged! Your input is incredibly valuable, and we encourage you to continue sharing your thoughts and ideas with us.

   
   

   Thanks for your understanding and for helping us shape the future of Paessler.

   
   

   Best regards,

   The Paessler Product Team

10. Centralized geolocation management

    Our devices are physically located at fixed sites. It makes more sense to manage these locations globally than per group/device/sensor, and it would also help with geolocation grouping and naming consistency.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    Declined  ·  AdminJonah Kowall (SVP Product and Design, Paessler) responded

    Hi there,

    
    

    Thank you again for submitting your idea to Paessler. We truly appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback.

    
    

    After careful consideration by our team, we've decided to decline this idea at this time. This decision was made based on several factors, which may include:

    • It doesn't align with our current product roadmap or strategic priorities.
    • The resources required for implementation outweigh the current projected benefits for our user base.
    • There are technical limitations that prevent us from moving forward.
    • A similar feature is already available or planned in a different way.

    
    

    While this particular idea won't be moving forward, please don't be discouraged! Your input is incredibly valuable, and we encourage you to continue sharing your thoughts and ideas with us.

    
    

    Thanks for your understanding and for helping us shape the future of Paessler.

    
    

    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

11. Add IPAM (IP address management) to PRTG

    As a PRTG user I would like to get an overview of my available IP addresses in the DHCP scope. PRTG competitors have this feature included.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    Declined  ·  AdminJonah Kowall (SVP Product and Design, Paessler) responded

    Hi there,

    
    

    Thank you again for submitting your idea to Paessler. We truly appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback.

    
    

    After careful consideration by our team, we've decided to decline this idea at this time. This decision was made based on several factors, which may include:

    • It doesn't align with our current product roadmap or strategic priorities.
    • The resources required for implementation outweigh the current projected benefits for our user base.
    • There are technical limitations that prevent us from moving forward.
    • A similar feature is already available or planned in a different way.

    
    

    While this particular idea won't be moving forward, please don't be discouraged! Your input is incredibly valuable, and we encourage you to continue sharing your thoughts and ideas with us.

    
    

    Thanks for your understanding and for helping us shape the future of Paessler.

    
    

    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

12. Add CVE vulnerability management

    As a PRTG user I would like to identify CVEs for firmware that I am using and get warnings.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    Declined  ·  AdminJonah Kowall (SVP Product and Design, Paessler) responded

    Hi there,

    
    

    Thank you again for submitting your idea to Paessler. We truly appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback.

    
    

    After careful consideration by our team, we've decided to decline this idea at this time. This decision was made based on several factors, which may include:

    • It doesn't align with our current product roadmap or strategic priorities.
    • The resources required for implementation outweigh the current projected benefits for our user base.
    • There are technical limitations that prevent us from moving forward.
    • A similar feature is already available or planned in a different way.

    
    

    While this particular idea won't be moving forward, please don't be discouraged! Your input is incredibly valuable, and we encourage you to continue sharing your thoughts and ideas with us.

    
    

    Thanks for your understanding and for helping us shape the future of Paessler.

    
    

    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team