Skip to content
← Welcome to Paessler User Voice!

Settings and activity

1 result found

  1. SSO with any Identity & Access Management (IAM) Solution via OpenID Connect (OIDC)

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Access Management  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Gathering Feedback  ·  AdminJonah Kowall (SVP Product and Design, Paessler) responded

    Hi there,


    Great news! Your idea has been approved and moved to the next stage on Paessler.


    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community. Your idea has the potential to significantly impact our users, and getting broader feedback will help us understand its full scope and prioritize it effectively.


    Here's how you can help:

    • Share your idea: Encourage other Paessler users to view, comment on, and vote for your idea.
    • Elaborate on your suggestion: Add more details, use cases, or examples to your idea description.
    • Engage with comments: Respond to questions and suggestions from other users.


    The more engagement your idea receives, the better its chances of being fully implemented.


    Thanks for your continued collaboration in making Paessler even better!


    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nicholas Hoyle commented  · 

    As an IT Infrastructure Manager, I want to configure the group claim name in PRTG's OIDC token settings so that I can integrate PRTG with our organization's existing identity provider without requiring changes to our standardized OIDC claim naming conventions.

    Currently, PRTG SSO Okta integration requires the claim name "groups" which is not flexible and cannot be used if you don't control the Okta setup or it is incompatible with standards in use. Other OIDC integrations (like Jira) allow you to set the name of the groups claim, so it can be compatible with your organizations OIDC setup. We would prefer to be able to name the groups claim to something else within the config of PRTG.

    Nicholas Hoyle supported this idea  ·