Skip to content
← Welcome to Paessler User Voice!

Settings and activity

1 result found

  1. SSO with any Identity & Access Management (IAM) Solution via OpenID Connect (OIDC)

    10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Access Management  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    On Roadmap  ·  AdminIsidora Jeremic (Admin, Paessler) responded

    Hi there,

    Great news! Your idea has been reviewed and is now officially on our roadmap! This means we've committed to developing it in the future.

    While we don't have an exact release date yet, we're planning to implement this feature/improvement as part of our upcoming development cycles. We're excited about the value this will bring to our users.

    We appreciate your patience as we work to bring this to fruition. We'll let you know once it moves into active development.

    Thanks for helping us build a better Paessler!

    Best regards,

    The Paessler Product Team

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nicholas Hoyle commented  · 

    As an IT Infrastructure Manager, I want to configure the group claim name in PRTG's OIDC token settings so that I can integrate PRTG with our organization's existing identity provider without requiring changes to our standardized OIDC claim naming conventions.

    Currently, PRTG SSO Okta integration requires the claim name "groups" which is not flexible and cannot be used if you don't control the Okta setup or it is incompatible with standards in use. Other OIDC integrations (like Jira) allow you to set the name of the groups claim, so it can be compatible with your organizations OIDC setup. We would prefer to be able to name the groups claim to something else within the config of PRTG.

    Nicholas Hoyle supported this idea  ·