Skip to content

Settings and activity

2 results found

  1. 20 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi everyone,

    Thank you all for voting on this idea.

    Before we can commit to developing this idea, we need more input from the community.

    We want to clarify: filtering/controlling which interfaces are monitored by the SNMP Traffic sensor during Auto-Discovery has actually been possible in PRTG for quite some time, by editing the ODT file: https://helpdesk.paessler.com/en/support/solutions/articles/76000041645-how-can-i-include-and-exclude-sensors-from-device-templates-

    Since version PRTG .118, it has also been feasible with the SNMP Traffic v2 sensors.

    That said, we understand that manually editing ODT files is not the most intuitive experience, and we suspect that's exactly the pain point many of you are hitting.

    To help us prioritize the right improvements, we'd love to hear from you:

    • What is your specific use case? (e.g., filtering by interface name, speed, type, etc.)
    • What makes the current ODT-based approach difficult or impractical for you?
    • Would a graphical UI for managing these filters solve your problem?

    Thanks…

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Adam Schaeffer commented  · 

    This would be very helpful for our organization as well! This is a meaningful limitation for our PRTG use cases.

    Adam Schaeffer supported this idea  · 
  2. 25 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Sensors  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Adam Schaeffer commented  · 

    This is critical for us particularly with some interface types on open source routing systems. Really hoping this gets implemented soon. Thanks!

    Adam Schaeffer supported this idea  ·